![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
I hunted!
Didn't see a legged thing, about as expected.
First time I ever got around to hunting. Haven't gotten my hunting license yet, but I don't need one in my own yard. And I just need to be at least 300 feet from the closest house.
Part of my interest is predators that might eat chickens which I think I'm about to order. And all of those predators are currently in season (which still matters in my own yard).
There was definitely a predator of some kind. But most of the prints weren't fresh enough to tell more than pattern of tracks, including general size of the animal.
So I figured possibly fox, or maybe just house cat. I also saw tracks for rabbits (which I've actually seen), and something mouse like. Cute.
I wandered back into my woods around the South side of my property, and discovered that the growth is far less dense on that side. And North along my stream a bit. Getting my bearings and seeing what tracks there were to see. Lots of tracks in the snow, but none fresh.
I noticed activity tended to concentrate some under low hanging evergreens, so I picked a spot near some, and spent most of my time reclining against a tree there. Paying particular attention to the upwind direction.
I heard a dog barking way off in the distance, trees creaking against each other, a couple small birds, and I think nothing else but wind.
I continue to suspect I may have some advantage in spotting animals because of my visual search related brain damage. The part that's broken, which filters out visual background noise, isn't going to help anybody when animals are motionless. And I can see movement just fine. Methods I use to compensate for my visual search difficulty are what I think might help. "Is this item in my drawer a can opener? Nope. How about this one?" "Does this square foot contain an animal?"
When I decided to head in, I took a closer look at the tracks I had been staring at. I noticed drag marks. Then it became very clear where one animal pounced on another, and began dragging it off. And those tracks were fresher. The prints looked way too big to be a house cat. That was kind of exciting. I followed it to the North side of my yard, which was a little more difficult because it looked like it had doubled back on that path a few times.
After looking at the pocket guide to N.H. animal tracks, I'm fairly certain that the predator was a coyote (always in season) or fox (in season), and the tiny tracks were a white-footed mouse.
I am undecided on hearing protection while hunting, although I have noticed that the people who claim it doesn't cause significant damage don't seem to have done it for long. I didn't wear any today, partially because I expected chances of seeing something to shoot were so low.
I left my woods on the North side, with the incredibly dense small trees. Almost took my Ka-bar out to get the vines off of me. (I fully intended to field dress anything I might kill where it fell.)
My toes and butt (leaning against a tree) were coldest. Easy enough to fix. Ears and face probably come next. I had my hair out, which did a great job of keeping my head warm.
Update: I was hunting with my Bulgaria Arsenal SLR-95, which is one of the better semi-auto copies of the AK-47, with only 5 rounds in the magazine due to NH hunting law.
First time I ever got around to hunting. Haven't gotten my hunting license yet, but I don't need one in my own yard. And I just need to be at least 300 feet from the closest house.
Part of my interest is predators that might eat chickens which I think I'm about to order. And all of those predators are currently in season (which still matters in my own yard).
There was definitely a predator of some kind. But most of the prints weren't fresh enough to tell more than pattern of tracks, including general size of the animal.
So I figured possibly fox, or maybe just house cat. I also saw tracks for rabbits (which I've actually seen), and something mouse like. Cute.
I wandered back into my woods around the South side of my property, and discovered that the growth is far less dense on that side. And North along my stream a bit. Getting my bearings and seeing what tracks there were to see. Lots of tracks in the snow, but none fresh.
I noticed activity tended to concentrate some under low hanging evergreens, so I picked a spot near some, and spent most of my time reclining against a tree there. Paying particular attention to the upwind direction.
I heard a dog barking way off in the distance, trees creaking against each other, a couple small birds, and I think nothing else but wind.
I continue to suspect I may have some advantage in spotting animals because of my visual search related brain damage. The part that's broken, which filters out visual background noise, isn't going to help anybody when animals are motionless. And I can see movement just fine. Methods I use to compensate for my visual search difficulty are what I think might help. "Is this item in my drawer a can opener? Nope. How about this one?" "Does this square foot contain an animal?"
When I decided to head in, I took a closer look at the tracks I had been staring at. I noticed drag marks. Then it became very clear where one animal pounced on another, and began dragging it off. And those tracks were fresher. The prints looked way too big to be a house cat. That was kind of exciting. I followed it to the North side of my yard, which was a little more difficult because it looked like it had doubled back on that path a few times.
After looking at the pocket guide to N.H. animal tracks, I'm fairly certain that the predator was a coyote (always in season) or fox (in season), and the tiny tracks were a white-footed mouse.
I am undecided on hearing protection while hunting, although I have noticed that the people who claim it doesn't cause significant damage don't seem to have done it for long. I didn't wear any today, partially because I expected chances of seeing something to shoot were so low.
I left my woods on the North side, with the incredibly dense small trees. Almost took my Ka-bar out to get the vines off of me. (I fully intended to field dress anything I might kill where it fell.)
My toes and butt (leaning against a tree) were coldest. Easy enough to fix. Ears and face probably come next. I had my hair out, which did a great job of keeping my head warm.
Update: I was hunting with my Bulgaria Arsenal SLR-95, which is one of the better semi-auto copies of the AK-47, with only 5 rounds in the magazine due to NH hunting law.
no subject
do you have a .22LR or a .17? there's a couple models one can get, very accurate, and add a suppressor :) stupid coyotes won't know what hit them, and might stand around for more ;)
if you know where they're going to be, and don't mind building a blind, and baiting them... all the more fun.
300 feet always seemed bizarre to me, when even a .22LR can travel a mile.
#
no subject
Hiding in a blind and baiting sounds like way less fun to me.
300 feet sound great to me since it's easy enough to make sure that immediately after penetrating my target, a bullet will hit soft ground, with an extremely low chance dangerous ricochet. Also, because I'm sure that if discharging firearms no more than 300 feet from houses tended to cause injuries, I would know about it. Probably from law.
no subject
a .223 might be better for dropping a coyote at 100yds though.
well, it's sniping predators ;) not game... one is a job, the other is ... more ... i dunno, sporting?
well, i dunno about the drop on penetrating tiny prey.
when i worked in action, the police range was on the other side of the hill from our large parking lot, and quite frequently we'd find lead in the parking lot, broken windows, dented cars, and a LOT of them hit the building. quietly taken care of by the town. speaking of legal ;)
one of the worries at the range is "skipping", not so much a richochet, but like a stone on water, they've had some things leave the compound in odd ways.
#
no subject
no subject
very much overkill, but "yee hah" :)
still don't have a scope for mine... considering a shotgun first though.
#
no subject
FYI, if you want a shotgun useful for both home defense (short barrel) and hunting (long barrel), it looks like Remington (870) is the best option due to availability of magazine extension tubes.
no subject
they just cost about what a brand new 870 with the proper barrel would ;P that said, my local guy will sell me a 870 with two barrels of my choice as a kit, for a decent price.
in the other arena, i can very quickly obtain a 7+1 semi-auto with short for short money. could even be used for close range hunting and pest control. same model as featured in several movies not too long ago.
but mostly, i want to do trap at the club. can effectively do that for cheap with the 870.
#
no subject
But nowhere near the versatility (without swapping ammo) or capacity of an AK in the original 7.62x39mm.
no subject
#