darxus: (Default)
darxus ([personal profile] darxus) wrote2006-01-18 01:29 pm
Entry tags:

toys! new canon sd450 compact digital camera

It is the height and width of a credit card, 2.2cm thick, and takes 2592x1944 (5mp) pictures. Very sexy.

As a result, I should probably sell my Xacti C5 compact video camera, and find a way to trade my Sony Ericsson S710a cellphone for a black Motorola Razr.

Canon s200 (still)
Maybe 4 years ago I bought a Canon s200. I loved it, wore it every day (in a belt pouch). Someone was interested in buying a used one since they were impressed with how mine worked. I took the opportunity to upgrade.

Canon s45 (still)
I was initially thinking about staying in the same series, but decided to go with the larger s45 model instead to get more features. I never used the extra features, and I never carried it because it was too big, so it never got used. It got dropped the last time I moved and broke.

Sanyo Xacti VPC-C5 (video)
The lines between still and video cameras are blurring, and I felt a need to participate. The Xacti C5 is an incredible compact video camera - 640x480 @30fps for an hour on a 1gb sd card using MPEG4 (nice). It is also a good resolution still camera, but the quality of the stills has always bugged me, and I have done very little actual video recording.

To this day Canon's cameras use audio/video codecs that are agravatingly lame - "Movie: AVI (Image: Motion JPEG; Audio: WAVE (Monaural))". So they're just sticking a bunch of jpegs together and calling it a movie, and using an ancient bloated method of storing audio.

Sony Ericsson S710a (phone)
In september 2005 I noticed the existence of the new tinier camera size Canon put out, starting with the SD200. Very cute. But the resolution wasn't exciting. My 2 year Verizon contract ended and I wanted something more fun. I was torn between the Sony Ericsson S710a with the best camera in a phone, or getting a black Motorola Razr and the SD200. I got the S710a. 1280x960 is a respectable resolution, and the image quality is good - for a phone. But, it turns out, not enough to keep me happy as the only camera I regularly carry.

s450 (still)
I was in a Best Buy yesterday, and as always, I glanced at the still cameras on my way through. I saw the sd450. I noticed it was the same size as the teensy sd200. I looked it up, and got excited. Did a little research, and ordered it (I paid for fedex ground, I don't know why I got it the next day).

[identity profile] darxus.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I love http://www.dpreview.com/ - they have such great info on digital cameras.

For your question I went there, clicked Buying / Feature Search, then Format: Compact, and Price: <$200. I am clearly very fond of canon, they make nice stuff. I suspect you'd be happy with pretty much any canon. The A75 seems fine, but...

Canon A520, definitely. It's smaller, cheaper, and has 4x zoom instead of 3x. It's a decendent of the A75.

A75 $197.15, 2048x1536, 3x zoom, CF, 4 AA batteries
A80 $192.18, 2272x1704, 3x zoom, CF, 4 AA batteries
A510 $161.89, 2048x1536, 4x zoom, SD, 2 AA batteries
A520 $149.99, 2722x1704, 4x zoom, SD, 2 AA batteries

Prices are from http://www.pricegrabber.com/ including shipping.

dpreview feature comparson of these 4

The A80 has excessively good battery life - running 3 hours. 136 minutes for the A520, still very good, so I really doubt the difference is enough to go with the older more expensive camera. Battery info from http://www.imaging-resource.com/. You're probably going to want to get NiMH rechargables.

In depth review of the A520

I've bought from http://www.beachcamera.com/ and I just bought my new one from http://www.buydig.com/ - they have some of the best prices listed on pricegrabber.

You're probably going to want more than the 16mb storage that comes with it.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820211312 - 512mb sd card for $26 shipped. There are many options. That camera can take pictures from 84KB (worst quality) to 1002KB (1MB) (highest quality). The highest I'd probably recommend is Large (2272x1704) Fine, which is half a MB per image.

[identity profile] darxus.livejournal.com 2006-01-19 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
The "512mb sd card" I linked to here is a 256mb card. I'm not sure if that was a typo they've since fixed or I misread.